31/08/2022
Whether this is nucleus of Uranium 238 in the over space activated by swallowing energy spinning faster and fragmenting its arms because of that?
The topic here is: “M74, showcase the power of space observatories working together in multiple wavelengths. On the left, the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope’s view of the galaxy ranges from the older, redder stars towards the centre, to younger and bluer stars in its spiral arms, to the most active stellar formation in the red bubbles of H II regions. On the right, the NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope’s image is strikingly different, instead highlighting the masses of gas and dust within the galaxy’s arms, and the dense cluster of stars at its core. The combined image in the centre merges these two for a truly unique look at this “grand design” spiral galaxy.”
But first this: “Star formation is one of the most important processes in shaping the universe. In addition to birthing new stars, it gives rise to planetary systems and plays a pivotal role in the evolution of galaxies. Yet there is still much that astronomers do not understand about this fundamental process. The driving force behind star formation is particularly unclear for a type of galaxy called a flocculent spiral. Unlike grand-design spiral galaxies, flocculent spiral galaxies do not have well defined spiral arms. Instead, they appear to have many discontinuous arms.
M63, also known as the Sunflower galaxy, is one such flocculent spiral galaxy. Although it only has two arms, many appear to be winding around its yellow core in this image captured by Hubble. The arms shine with the radiation from recently formed blue stars and can be more clearly seen in infrared observations. By imaging flocculent spiral galaxies like M63, astronomers hope to gain a better understanding of how stars form in such systems.”
And before that step back with this topic:
“This striking cosmic whirl is the centre of galaxy NGC 524, as seen with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. This galaxy is located in the constellation of Pisces, some 90 million light-years from Earth.
NGC 524 is a lenticular galaxy. Lenticular galaxies are believed to be an intermediate state in galactic evolution — they are neither elliptical nor spiral. Spirals are middle-aged galaxies with vast, pinwheeling arms that contain millions of stars. Along with these stars are large clouds of gas and dust that, when dense enough, are the nurseries where new stars are born. When all the gas is either depleted or lost into space, the arms gradually fade away and the spiral shape begins to weaken. At the end of this process, what remains is a lenticular galaxy — a bright disc full of old, red stars surrounded by what little gas and dust the galaxy has managed to cling on to.”
Now second step back:
Whether this is the nucleus of Zirconium (Zr) in the over space?
I’m counting here 6 sleeves where some star (sun) there should passes through them coming from the center-going to the periphery and therefore such star must to have 6 belts of planet’s centripetal accelerations (our galaxy has three) and as to see fig.42 page 106 USM www.kanevuniverse.com you can convince yourself that the number of element is 40, i.e. this is nucleus of Zirconium in the over space!
According to some density calculations about the center of our galaxy and the density of the Sun which I posted many times the Sun masses in the center of our galaxy is approximate 2 billion sun masses acceleration, which does represent the acceleration of our galaxy nucleus and only about our position of observation. I repeat only about our position of observation, because if we sink towards the central zone where the density gradually decreases then the equivalent acceleration will decrease as well. So what withstand all stellar masses in our galaxy?....the gravity of the galaxy nucleus?......of course not because of decreasing centripetal accelerations……then what is the mechanism? The answer lies in the time interpretation of galaxy expansion. It becomes very slowly about our observation 13 bln years or so and do imagine this simple picture: Stars from the galaxy nucleus simply scamper away in radial direction, then their tangential velocity will remain the same as it was on the periphery of the nucleus of the galaxy and by this way forms the belts of the galaxy. But that become very slowly for us some billions of years. So obviously we don’t need of dark matter to explain why the tangential velocity remain mainly constant depending by the radius increasing of the galaxy and how these so much stars are withstand together, because they actually disperse themselves and their places are taken by the new stars coming from inside of the nucleus. But so called dark matter exist because increasingly mass of proto particle towards the mass of proton in our position of observation requires swallowing of new mass from the surrounding area which are very young looking (only for our position of observation) sub galaxy from the subspace. But more for that some another day!
Whether the thickening of the space influences length of the waves consequently its frequency and hence speed of time flow observed far away from the event itself?
Suggestion:
When we observe distant object, we make this from our point of observation. According to USM www.kanevuniverse.com we must to take into account the thickening of the space in this area, which is simply: ∆s=t.V where V is the velocity of birth of the object which we observe (see USM), t=D/C where D is the distance to the observed object and C is the velocity of light. So we can see that how much we are distantly from the observed object that much greater is the thickening of the space on this object. But what will happen if the thickening is so great that the length of periphery of this object becomes equal to zero or negative like a measurement from this distant point of observation? The answer is given in USM www.kanevuniverse.com namely the periphery length comes into quantum length changing, similar to the swallowing of quantum energy portion. It means that the radius of this object is changing by known quantum mechanical rules, i.e. 2 times smaller, 3 times smaller and soon.
Because the thickening of the space is truth only in our point of observation follows that the same velocity on the phenomenon district will pass the same space there but in our position of observation (far away) that will like as far fast passing and hence for smaller time flowing.
So showing galaxy possesses bigger periphery tangential velocity, in this case velocity of birth of stars there and that is why they shine brightly but not because they are young!
According to shown design of universe what is the typical galaxies in the universe corresponding to the atoms (nuclei) in the over space and what is this one which we observe in moment of swallowing energy and what will looks like the collision between two nuclei and what should like on “unstable particles fermions, mesons and so on” in over space similar to same particles but in our space?
Why our galaxy is most probably the atom (nuclei) of sodium in the over space? Because this galaxy possesses three belt of centripetal acceleration correspond to the nucleus of sodium as we looking at the layer structure of the nuclei in our space and this conclusion follow by the three belts of planets accelerations in solar system see page 23 part I USM www.kanevuniverse.com. These belts of planet accelerations did born when the Sun passed through these three belts of centripetal acceleration on our galaxy. Hence the typical galaxies are spiral galaxies and the smaller galaxies with for example only two sleeves correspond to lighter nuclei and bigger galaxies with multitude sleeves correspond to heavier nuclei.
We said above that the stars in the periphery of galaxy “Zirconium” (nucleus in the over space) possess 6 belt of planet’s accelerations which raises question how they are distributed because our planets system is described by this sequence: 0,54 1,0 0,75 (page 23). The answer is in form.1; 4(A) pages 38; 39 USM www.kanevuniverse.com and it is: (2,45;1,45;1,95;0,95;2,116;1,116;1,616;0,616) Taking biggest number 2,45 as 1,0 follow: 1,0;0,59;0,796;0,39;0,863;0,456;0,66;0,25 Now to arrange numbers similar to page 40 we obtain:(0,59+0,46)/2;1,0;0,863;0,796;0,66; (0,39+0,25)/2 it is seen that there are 4 giant planet’s accelerations similar to Jupiter and Saturn and two rock’s planet’s accelerations.
Next: Sleeves of galaxy: When some galaxy hasn’t sleeves or the spinning is regular then we can imagine that this galaxy is spinning periphery only because there is swallowing up energy in the over space, see this: What is quantum gravity? To be possible to quantity some gravitational field (acceleration) there is necessary the gravitational wave to exist. Because the galaxies in our space are atoms (nuclei) in the over space then the radiation of waves actually do have frequency in the over space in accordance with efficient of time connection between the spaces, see part II USM www.kanevuniverse.com So let calculate how will look like the frequency of some atom’s quantum stimulation in our space of atoms, transported into the over space where the galaxies in our space are the atoms (nuclei) in the over space. We need simply to multiplied this “our’ frequency by the time constant, which is 〖10〗^31 folds and if for example this frequency is 〖10〗^16 [hrz] then the equivalent “quantum stimulation” of some galaxy in the over space will run about 〖10〗^15 [s]→≈〖10〗^8 [years] i.e. almost 1 billion Earth’s years and this will be only one semi period of this gravitational wave. So obviously galaxies which haven’t sleeves and hence spinning unusually quickly are elliptical galaxies and any formless object in the universe do represent unstable particle in the over space. Only long time observation can say us which is the correct answer about any concrete case; we already mapping the position of stars in our galaxy and depending by how accurately we made up this then after 100 or more years we should observe the expansion of our galaxy as well.
Now the conclusions about the topic here:
First it is seen that the sleeves are multitude numbers as it is difficult to be counted, obviously this is very heavier nucleus in the over space! Whether this is indeed nucleus of Uranium 235 is difficult to assert but as well is seen that this nucleus is in very high energy activated state which maybe is corresponding to nuclear reaction within!
Second: Most probably the view: …. “Lenticular galaxies are believed to be an intermediate state in galactic evolution — they are neither elliptical nor spiral.”….is not so because there is not taken into account shown above about energy activated galaxies and this is in force about so called new born stars on the periphery of any galaxy which was discussed many times in current posts!
…”Along with these stars are large clouds of gas and dust that, when dense enough, are the nurseries where new stars are born.”…. Obviously existence of cloud of dust and gas there is proof that there have been massive nebulas explosions and the reminders afterwards could attract some part of this gas and cloud to reignite again nuclear fusion which phenomena looks like newly born stars but they are not!
And third: …“When all the gas is either depleted or lost into space, the arms gradually fade away and the spiral shape begins to weaken. At the end of this process, what remains is a lenticular galaxy — a bright disc full of old, red stars surrounded by what little gas and dust the galaxy has managed to cling on to.” Whether this is renders proof in observation and how exactly will continue this process can say only the future observation of this very interesting galaxy!
Now about this topic:
It is obvious that shown galaxy M63 is bigger one and the supposition that this is huge galaxy is correct as well it is correct that this galaxy swallowing energy by surrounding area and fragmenting its arms! But about the second assertion: “In addition to birthing new stars, it gives rise to planetary systems and plays a pivotal role in the evolution of galaxies.” We need to remind again this:
Interesting question with this topic:
“Because the region producing bright X-rays is small, a planet passing in front of it could block most or all of the X-rays, making the transit easier to spot because the X-rays can completely disappear. This could allow exoplanets to be detected at much greater distances than current optical light transit studies, which must be able to detect tiny decreases in light because the planet only blocks a tiny fraction of the star.”
First this: Where in our galaxy can expect scientifically intelligence life without any fantastic imagination, only scientifically? The short answer is in around the radius-orbit of our Sun in the galaxy and bigger one and into star system where the star is similar to the Sun like age and size. That guaranty that this star has similar to our solar system planets, but like own belts of centripetal accelerations, not compulsory exactly the same sizes planets like ours. And one more important condition: this star to possess similar angular velocity of revolving to our sun. That is important because this velocity actually is the velocity of birth about each orbiting around the star planet. Proofs: Let begin with this: Mercury as well the other planets in the solar system was born from the Sun because all planets centripetal acceleration fulfills the rule: g=(V.C)/R ln(1+V/C) where R – is the distance between the planet and the Sun, V=w.R where w – is the angular velocity of the equatorial area of the Sun. See USM part I www.kanevuniverse.com Obtained result coincides with the same acceleration estimated by the law: g=G.M/r^2 Second important suggestion is that the Sun in fact synthesis all nature element until uranium, but not only iron how was estimated so far. It is so because of the essence of the field, see again Part I USM. So the core of the Sun is contains from super dense and therefore with huge gravitational attraction material - nuclear chain, most probably from uranium nuclei, see joromachine www.kanevuniverse.com and with super strong common magnetic moment. That is why the Sun changes its magnetic poles for about 11 years or so – because of the interaction between this core and the plasma surrounding it. How it is seen this core reminds the so called “neutron star”, which of course hasn’t any physical means because such creation is impossible as well this is in force about the so called “black hole”. Such core possesses any star, even any planet but the difference is only in the size of the core – in smallest objects this core can be only centimeter’s radius (see again USM and essence of the field). The size of the core of our Sun is around 70 km in radius (see USM). For example proof about this assertion we can find out in rings and moons of Saturn, in their different direction of revolving (some of them), which shows that the core of Saturn also changes its polarization, similarly to the Sun, but very slowly, because the Saturn is far smaller and far cooler than the Sun. Now we can suppose that Mercury (because it was born by the Sun last in line) has most large quantity of heaviest elements in comparison with the rest of the planets and that is why Mercury is most dense object in the solar system. Maybe the core of Mercury is responsible for volcanic activity there and maybe it is in force about all planets?!
So as I said the beginning particle in the center of our galaxy – proto particle it is a very young galaxy from the subspace, which because of the thickening of the micro cosmos and expansion of the macro cosmos of our space where is situated our galaxy, gradually form the three stable particles in our space: proton, electron and neutrino. During the movement of the Sun towards the periphery of our galaxy the proton and electron become heavier and the neutrino becomes lighter. If we sink in the space of this proto particle and become part of it we can see galaxy with very many stars from the subspace, similar to ours, so the temperature there will be significant, but because in the very beginning of this proto particle appearance in our space, when this particle haven’t yet orbital system, for us the energy don’t exist. When on the center of our galaxy there is created, because of the gravitational field of our galaxy, enough quantity of these proto particles again thanks to the same field there begin to form the stars, which creates exactly copy of our galaxy but with very young matter-all this in our space. The light ray radiated from these substars becomes older together with the movement of the Sun towards the periphery of our galaxy (i.e. together with the aging of the Sun), so the age of the relic radiation is roughly 13 bln years. That has nothing to do with the high energy particles, which can to exist in our galaxy and on the between galaxy space, because of the many reasons. The gravitation field and inertial matter balance, about our galaxy indeed leads to necessity of existence of same matter so called dark matter, but there isn’t take into account the way of forming of the gravitation field according to USM www. kanevuniverse.com….and many more!
So let continue from here: As I said in the part I on the theory USM www.kanevuniverse.com when the Sun passes through the galaxy belts of centripetal accelerations, then were borne the three groups of planets on the solar system due the disturbance of these belts field over the Sun own centripetal acceleration – inertial balance and the planets at these moments to until now are around 4-5 billion (the comets, asteroids and cosmic gas have nothing to do with the planets formation, on contrary these objects were borne together with the planets and therefore with the same age) At this moment of planets birth the Sun already contains atoms from protons and electrons but a lot lighter than their present masses and continuously become heavier.
Important conclusion: Is it possible the stars from the center of galaxy to possesses planets before to reach the first belt of galaxy’s centripetal acceleration? The answer is not it is impossible!
Then appears the question: Whether on the periphery of any galaxy and the looks like young stars can possess planets because these stars already passed through all galaxy centripetal accelerations belts? That is the answer:
Whether this is a proof of star-nebula formation as it is explained below?
And the topic in this case: Is it possible the star remainder after its explosion to attract and reignite fusion of between galaxy hydrogen and hence shining in ultra violet wave length?
About the density and mass of the Sun in the past and at the future: Let begin with part II USM www.kanevuniverse.com pages 32, 33, 34 and the conclusion: “We can see that the obtained result is coincides good with the experimental value – 35 times. It means that electrostatic force is the same that is the nuclear one, and by this it is the same as gravitational force, as well”.
This conclusion shows that in the beginning of formation of Sun on the center of our galaxy its density is the same as it is now in our living point - spot in the galaxy and only the size and mass is increases but not the density of the Sun. According to above the same is in force about any stable particle proton (neutron) electron and neutrino! So any particle possesses volume; point-particles are mathematical category which hasn’t physical means!
Now why the Sun was born on the center of our galaxy (almost on the center)? Pages 81, 82 USM where the final radius of Sun’s birth is (formula 83): 4,27.〖10〗^10 [cm] to be possible the Sun to has respectively density corresponding to its centripetal acceleration on its surface. The same density on this galaxy radius possess all stable particles and the same density characterization they have now in our point of observation but the size and mass of proton and electron are increase and the mass and size of neutrino is decreases.
What is the hided mechanism of fusion on the star’s core? The Sun actually synthesis much heavier elements than helium, until to uranium and each sphere object such as planets, moons and stars compulsory possesses nucleus from super material representing nuclear chain with huge density and common magnetic moment (in our solar system that nuclear chain is forms most probably by uranium nuclei)? In part I and part II USM www.kanevuniverse.com is shown why the gravitational field has inertial character and what means this. Summarizing it is repulsion between the atoms (nuclei) when they are thickened so close by the outside applying pressure for example, that atoms (nuclei) cannot create their own fields (there aren’t place for that) and to restore the equilibrium between the centripetal and centrifugal forces in any such orbital system, there appears the force of repulsion. There is important to suggest that the outside pressure must to be in volume mode, because if it isn’t the matter simply will flow away where absent pressure. And very importantly is that sinking into the center of such spherical object the pressure is increasing not proportionally as it is in case of gas laws (pressure volume temperature) but exponentially because of this inertial character i.e. power of gas law it isn’t 1 to 2 raised to a power but a lot bigger number. So going at the center of the Sun for example theoretically the pressure inclining to infinity! The pressure increases in volume mode and we have repulsion as well. Then according to the formula g=G M/r^2 the pressure will become almost infinity when the radius (r) inclining to zero! Obviously each object even smallest moons has nucleus, it maybe centimeter’s size, but exist! That is why the Sun synthesis any heaviest nuclei until uranium….. why until uranium, but not more heaver elements and why the uranium is the last stable element in the nature table you can see in USM www.kanevuniverse.com especially pages 235 to 238.
The heavier elements which aren’t form solid stuff of the star will come to disintegration when the pressure and temperature within its volume reach the following values: 2.〖10〗^(27 ) atm.[kg/〖cm〗^2 ];3.〖10〗^11°K, see USM www.kanevuniverse.com The same is corresponds to the evolution of the neutron’s stars. When the fuel of the some star comes to its end, which means that not only the thermonuclear synthesis of hydrogen atoms already is spend, but the thermo nuclear synthesis of more heavier atoms also is on its end, then the star begins to collapse (to shrinking) and when the above values of the pressure and temperature are reached, then these atoms come to disintegration finally again into hydrogen atoms, but old ones see USM www.kanevuniverse.com After that again according to part I of the theory the pressure and temperature begin to decreases and again is ignites the thermonuclear synthesis, the star begin to expand reaching the pressure and temperature above which this reaction is possible: 2.〖10〗^9 atm.;〖10〗^7°K Below these parameters the thermonuclear reaction stops and the star disperse itself. Why the gravitation field cannot stop this process? Because the star is already on the periphery of its galaxy where it hasn’t necessary resonance radius to spring up again, see page 80, 81, 82, 83 USM www.kanevuniverse.com So there is one exception if the observed star is very massive one, then if the resonance radius where the star is situated during its collapsing is enough short then there can be born some little star which its own centripetal acceleration correspond to their current parameters: velocity of birth and radius of birth. However, most probably the star springs up like supernova and after that die. But before to disintegrate the synthesized already heavier nuclei there appears another last possible process which counteracting agents this huge pressure and this is nuclear chain (similar to crystal lattice but without electrons…. the knots of this “crystal lattice” are the nuclei themselves, see joromachine www.kanevuniverse.com ) So this huge condensed matter possesses common magnetic moment and it is huge (unknown here on Earth and that is the magnetars – core of the exploded star) Why such super material possesses common magnetic moment you can see in part III USM shown site and from where coming up the presented numerical values of pressure and temperature you can see in part III and part IV. How this magnetar and why it will disintegrate itself? Most probably by this way:
Let begin with the physically essence of the light spread in the known to us here on Earth materials. We know that indeed the absent of reflection means full transparency (as we don’t discuss for now how accurately can to be such process). It’s means that the light ray cannot affect the atoms (nuclei) of material where it passes at all. Is it possible? Of course not! But interacting with the surrounding matter, the light ray vibrating points of this material where it can feel some resonance or almost resonance achievement. So the light ray passing is always resonance process. If the resonance process hits only frequencies which aren’t in the visual spectrum, then this material is visually transparent, but that material may to be non heat frequency transparent. So all depends by the material, but it is means that the Planck law is incorrect? Of course not, because it describes one more theoretically event called absolute black body. Absolute black body means matter which absorbs and respectively radiates all spectrums of so called electromagnetic waves. Whether such material existing in the universe in this ideal form? Of course not, because if this was possible then all these material should be identical and therefore non distinguishable. But known here on Earth “black bodies” (or black cavity) possesses very close to maintained above properties. In the universe can exist material which cannot swallow but fully radiates all visually and heat frequencies, which remember effect of absolute black body, but it is not. See the next:
The Planck’s law cannot apply in equilibrium condition (such conditions don’t exist in reality, see below). The Planck constant can to be numerically equal to 1 (energy equilibrium) only in case of full (not approximately) but full reflection. Even I assert below about new material (nuclear chain nature joromachine www.kanevuniverse.com ) which has full but not approximate reflection, it is valid only about known now existing spectrum of radiations which recover all video, nuclear spectrum, including heat spectrums which is interesting to us because we will try to produce rocket chamber from this material, where we can directly ignite thermonuclear synthesis and this chamber will withstand these huge pressure and temperature. But we cannot assert that this is the all possible spectrum in the universe, because if we success to create such material (nuclear chain), then this material will has very specific resonance spectrum of vibration of nuclei knots of such imagine “crystal lattice”. So what should be this frequency? It will be somewhere between the frequencies of gamma rays and ultra violet rays. So if we make “laser crystal” from such material then we can use this unknown for now rays to tools this material! Eventually existing of such frequencies in the universe finally will disintegrate this super material!
Conclusion: Shown young nebula relatively close to our point of observation in our galaxy shows mainly blue wave length spectrum which is proof that in the beginning of star explosion there is spark firstly hydrogen nuclei as nuclear synthesis exactly how is explained above.
Second conclusion: The answer of asking question: “Is it possible the star remainder after its explosion to attract and reignite fusion of between galaxy hydrogen and hence shining in ultra violet wave length?” is yes this is possible!
Third conclusion: Such stars on the periphery of any galaxy cannot possess planets!
Now the essence of this post:
Whether the thickening of the space affects the time measure in our position of observation far away from the event appearance?
When we observe the centre of our galaxy, we make this from the radius-position of our Sun. According to USM www.kanevuniverse.com we must to take into account the thickening of the space in this area, which is simply: ∆s=t.V where V is the velocity of birth of the object which we observe (see USM), t=D/C where D is the distance to the observed object and C is the velocity of light. So we can see that how much we are distantly from the observed object that much greater is the thickening of the space on this object. But what will happen if the thickening is so great that the length of periphery of this object becomes equal to zero or negative like a measurement from this distant point of observation? The answer is given in USM www.kanevuniverse.com namely the periphery length comes into quantum length changing, similar to the swallowing of quantum energy portion. It means that the radius of this object is changing by known quantum mechanical rules, i.e. 2 times smaller, 3 times smaller and soon.
About shown object from JPL and NASA and assertion that this is two “black holes” interacting each other: The distance to this object is 3,8 billion light years or so. When the light ray start from this object towards us (Earth) the velocity of birth of the periphery matter- let accept that it is in order of 300 km/s how it is in our galaxy (average tangential velocity of revolving). Maybe this velocity is differently, but it is impossible a lot (USM www.kanevuniverse.com ). During light ray traveling from this object to us, the velocity of birth shrinks the perimeter of the periphery by the formula:
∆P=V_B (D(distance))/(C(velocity of light))= 300[km/s] (3,8.〖10〗^9.〖10〗^13 [km])/(3.〖10〗^5 [km/s] )=300.1,26.〖10〗^17 [s]=3,8.〖10〗^19 [km]
If the diameter of these two objects are approximately the same as it is in our galaxy around 5.〖10〗^4 light years=5.〖10〗^17 [km] , then follows that the efficiency of thickening is equal to
K=(3,8.〖10〗^19 [km])/(5.〖10〗^17 [km] )≈100[times] Therefore all distances in this object are shrinking around 100 times And if this object indeed is energy activated, then the velocity of birth can be 10 time bigger or so and hence the shrinking is 1000 times. So obviously the real spot diameter of these objects is around 1000 times bigger than what we see from Earth and the distance between these two objects it isn’t 1 light year but 1000 light years and the observed length of waves from here (Earth) must to increase 1000 times. The same it is in force about the spot energy E=h.γ→ real spot energy is 1000 times smaller than what we observing from Earth. You can see that this energy concentration which we observing from here (Earth), in fact is far more normal and therefore violence looking object called “black hole” is illusion.
Final conclusion: Shown topic assertion: “Because the region producing bright X-rays is small, a planet passing in front of it could block most or all of the X-rays, making the transit easier to spot because the X-rays can completely disappear. This could allow exoplanets to be detected at much greater distances than current optical light transit studies, which must be able to detect tiny decreases in light because the planet only blocks a tiny fraction of the star.” Is wrong because the thickening of the space is truth only in our point of observation and follows that the same velocity on the phenomenon district will pass the same space there but in our position of observation (far away) that will like as far fast passing and hence for smaller time flowing! G.Kanev
